Not optimized for performance: The runserver is single-threaded and not optimized for handling a large number of concurrent requests. It doesn’t fully leverage the hardware capabilities of a production server and may struggle to handle high traffic loads efficiently.
Lack of security features: The runserver does not offer the same security features and protections that production-ready servers should have. It lacks options for HTTPS configuration, fine-grained access control, and other security enhancements necessary to protect the application from potential threats.
No process manager or automatic restarts: In production, it’s essential to have a process manager that can automatically restart the server in case of crashes or memory leaks. The runserver does not have such capabilities.
Limited scalability: The runserver does not support multi-process or multi-threaded deployment, which limits its scalability when trying to handle a significant number of requests concurrently.
No load balancing: In production, you usually need load balancing to distribute incoming requests across multiple application instances. The runserver does not provide built-in load balancing capabilities.
Gunicorn (Green Unicorn): Gunicorn is a widely used production server for Django applications. It is designed to work with multiple concurrent requests and can be easily integrated with various web servers like Nginx or Apache using reverse proxy settings.
uWSGI: Similar to Gunicorn, uWSGI is another production-ready server that can serve Django applications efficiently. It provides extensive configuration options and supports multiple protocols.
mod_wsgi: If you are using Apache web server, mod_wsgi is a good option. It allows you to run Django applications within Apache, providing good performance and stability.
Daphne and ASGI servers: If your Django application utilizes asynchronous features and uses the ASGI protocol (for example, with Django Channels), you might consider using Daphne or other ASGI servers like uvicorn or Hypercorn.